Comparison of Students Score between Progress Test and Final Test; Pilot Project

Authors

  • Berry Erida Hasbi Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indoensia, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Windy Nur Aisyah Curriculum and Assessment, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indoensia, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Farah Ekawati Mulyadi Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indoensia, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33096/gmj.v7i3.213

Keywords:

Assessment, progress test, final test

Abstract

Introduction: The implementation of diverse assessment methods has facilitated the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data, providing students with valuable feedback. Most programs reported that their assessment strategies were aligned with a competency framework, emphasizing constructive alignment and assessments structured according to Miller’s pyramid. Many programs highlighted the significance of multiple low-stakes workplace-based assessments for evaluating real-world competencies, alongside the use of the final test, including progress testing in the knowledge domain to decrease student load. The aim of this study is to compare student final score between the progress test and the final test.

Methods: This is a mixed-method research. A quantitative of 506 students participated in the growth and development & geriatrics block, divided into two groups. Group A (progress test), comprising 253 students, underwent a progress test conducted over four exam sessions in 2024, as a pilot project.  Meanwhile, Group B (final test), also with 253 students, completed a final test in 2023. The data from both groups were collected and analyzed using the T-independent test. Also, qualitative data was taken by student interviews.

Result: Group A, assessed in 2024, achieved a higher average score (69.33 ± 11.22) compared to Group B (54.92 ± 11.49). The T-independent test yielded a P value of <0.0001, indicating a statistically significant difference. This suggests that the progress test method is more effective than the final test in enhancing students' final scores, as progress tests help alleviate cognitive load.

Conclusion: As a pilot initiative, the progress test has proven effective in improving students' final scores. It is recommended that this approach be extended to other educational blocks that have similar characteristics to the interventional blocks to enhance overall educational quality.

 

References

Van der Vleuten CPM, Verwijnen GM, Wijnen WHFW. 1996. Fifteen years of experience with progress testing in a problem-based learning curriculum. Med Teach 18:103–109

Cahyono,A.Astrid P. king S. Pribadi. Dwi M. 2022. Progress Test pada Pendidikan Dokter: Sebuah Refleksi Kemampulaksanaan dan Manfaat bagi Mahasiswa Kedokteran.

Widiantari,P. Ningrum, R. Ekayani, N. 2024. Nilai Progress Test Sebagai Prediktor Indeks Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Kedokteran Tahap Akademik.

Ningrum, R. Ekayani, N. 2022. Gambaran nilai progress test pada mahasiswa kedokteran.

Yuhernita. Mirfat. 2014. Pemanfaatan Progress Test Sebagai Tolak Ukur Keberhasilan Belajar Mahasiswa.

Wrigley, W. Vleuten, C. Freeman, A. Muijtjens, A. 2012. A systemic framework for the progress test: Strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71.

Norman G, Neville A, Blake JM, Mueller B. The critical role of feedback in assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):e348–e351.

Ricketts C, Bligh J, Barton JR, McCoubrie P. The role of progress testing in improving student learning and outcomes. Med Educ. 2010;44(7):711–717.

Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment: From assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach. 2011;33(6):478–485.

Safi, Z., & Zhang, T. The role of progress testing in evaluating knowledge retention in medical education. Medical Education. 2021. 55(6), 702-711

Muijtjens AMM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CPM. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Med Educ. 2008;42(10):989–998.

Ferguson E, James D, Madeley L. Factors associated with success in medical school. BMJ. 2002;324:952–957.

Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004;38(9):1006–1012.

Bennett, M. E., & Powers, K. The effectiveness of feedback from progress tests in fostering self-reflection among medical students. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2022. 9, 2382120522107586.

Chan S, Patil NG, Chen JY. Progress testing in medical education: A systematic review. Med Educ. 2018;52(12):1145–1156.

Ten Cate O, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. Med Teach. 2011;33(12):961–973.

Kerdijk W, Cohen-Schotanus J, Muntinghe FLH, et al. Cumulative assessment: A new assessment approach for improving student learning? Med Teach. 2013;35(12):e1595–e1600.

Moffat, M., & Zibrowski, E. Progress testing and its impact on reducing student anxiety in medical education. Medical Teacher. 2020. 42(1), 45-51.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Original Article